Are No Fly Lists Legal

Lists of personal public health and sharpening information are two different but complementary travel control tools. The TSA manages the Do Not Board, which prevents infected people from flying. The Public Health Watch List is managed by Customs and Border Protection and prevents people from crossing the U.S. border. Since their inception in 2007, both lists have been used primarily for TUBERCULOSis cases. Worse still, Maniar was that in the years he had lived under government suspicion, Maniar was unable to continue his normal lifestyle of frequent travel. After several unsuccessful attempts to board flights, where he was sometimes beaten by FBI agents at the airport who prevented him from boarding, his lawyers had conducted a lengthy administrative process with the Department of Homeland Security and found that he had been placed on the government`s secret no-fly list. They launched a legal attempt to whitewash his name and remove it, which took several years of fighting an opaque system set up by Homeland Security to secretly blacklist suspected terrorists. Maniar is currently fighting in court to have his name removed from the list of elected officials, one of other secret lists created from the terrorism tracing database.

Although the Department of Homeland Security has confirmed to him in writing that he is allowed to fly by being removed from the no-fly list, winning this fight doesn`t mean much if every foreign country he arrives has flagged him as a potential terrorist because of his presence in another secret database or because information has been shared with foreign governments. that it is a danger, but the follow-up messages that clarify it never reach them. Despite years of efforts by civil rights lawyers and journalists, much remains unknown about the watchlist program, including how the information used to create the list could be used by foreign governments. Prior to the September 11, 2001 attacks, this U.S. list was also used to hijack aircraft from U.S. airspace that do not have take-off targets or points of arrival in the United States. The number of people on the list increases and decreases according to reports on threats and intelligence services. There were 16,000[2] names on the list in 2011, 21,000 in 2012 and 47,000 in 2013.

If a new list for unruly passengers were created, as the Delta CEO repeated, there would be similar and different effects from the current no-fly list. First, human rights and due process are again a matter of concern. The ACLU`s position is that the government has failed to provide a constitutionally adequate means for individuals to challenge their listing,[89] and that «constitutional rights are at stake when the government stigmatizes Americans as suspected terrorists and bans them from traveling abroad.» [90] In the years following 9/11, the U.S. government developed an extensive surveillance system to prosecute individuals suspected of being a threat to national security. In 2013, a list known as the Terrorism Tracing Database – TSDB, better known as the Terrorist Watchlist – had hundreds of thousands of names. These were people, some U.S. citizens, whom the government had blacklisted without due process because they had possible ties to terrorist groups. Information from the terrorist watch list has been used to create other lists that have been used to subject people to additional scrutiny at borders, airports, or even during routine meetings with U.S. law enforcement.

These smaller lists included the no-fly list, which excludes people from air travel, as well as another database called the Selected Persons List, which identifies individuals under further examination at airports and border crossings. Specifically with respect to the no-fly list, U.S. citizens and permanent residents can now go through a legal process to get away from the list. But even if they are released to steal, it remains possible that they will remain on other secret lists or that negative information about them will persist in the databases of foreign governments. The dangers of this could be very serious, especially if people on the watch list travel to foreign countries where legal protection is weak. Senator Frank Lautenberg of New Jersey has repeatedly introduced a bill to ban people on terrorism watch lists (such as the no-fly list) from purchasing firearms or explosives, but these efforts have not been successful. [26] [27] [28] Senator Dianne Feinstein of California revived the legislation after the November 2015 Paris attacks, and President Barack Obama called for the passage of such legislation. [26] When a person is placed on the no-fly list, they are prohibited from «flying to, from or over the United States.