Difference between Legal Obligation and Ethical Responsibility

There are many ethical and legal examples drawn from practice. Violation of ethical standards does not necessarily deserve to be punished unless it is a matter of standards dictated to their members by certain professional associations. Here, violations of the organization`s ethical standards can be countered by sanctions, the severity of which may vary depending on the organization. To learn more about ethical responsibility, check out our Video Series Of Being The Best Of Yourself. These videos explore various important elements for making moral decisions and acting ethically. Part 1, Moral Conscience, explores the ability to recognize and appreciate the ethical aspects of decisions. Part 2, Moral Decision-Making, explains how to give a reasonable and defensible answer to an ethical question. Part 3, Moral Intent, explores the desire to act ethically and overcome rationalization in the face of a decision. Finally, Part 4, Moral Action, describes the steps needed to turn the intention to do the right thing into reality. When it comes to ethical issues, the stakes are often high, if not for the company, at least for the employees and managers involved. For example, what should an HR generalist do if he promises to keep something confident, and that promise proves impossible? The term «legal» is derived from the law. The origin of the word «legal» goes back to the English-French word «legalis».

It was in 1562 that the term «legal» was used. Today, many questions are raised and questioned in terms of legality or ethics. The strange relationship between the two is evident in the fact that the basic word or concepts of law (law) and ethics (ethics) have the same type of relationship. Many existing laws have their origin in ethics, while ethics in turn is rooted in morality and the perception of the correctness or lie of an action or behavior. Another difference between the two concepts is that they don`t necessarily always go hand in hand. There are cases when legal acts may be unethical, and there are also times when an ethical act is considered illegal. It all depends on the current laws in force and the perception of people in the act as well as outside the law. Another similarity is that legal and ethical standards are there to help society as a whole. Legal standards are there to allow authorities to punish offenders so that people have some kind of security. Ethical standards exist for the same reason. Both are there to help people feel safe and prevent people from being hurt by others.

Although Taft pursued many of Roosevelt`s policies, he was inclined to examine the facts of the situation and make a decision based on evidence. Roosevelt, on the other hand, was more inclined to do what he thought was «right.» Their disagreements, which focused on the grey areas of legal and ethical, eventually led to the rupture within the Republican Party in the 1912 election. Ethical responsibility is the ability to recognize and act on ethical values according to standards in a particular field or context. Ethical responsibility therefore refers to the responsibility to follow the code of ethics of an organization, institute, company, etc. Ethics are the moral codes followed by people in a country, company, organization, company, etc. Therefore, ethics are rights that are considered morally just. So these are not laws, but obligations. Moreover, it is a decision of a person to follow this ethic or not. Examine the role of values and value systems in shaping the relationship between laws and ethics; Watch the GVV video series to learn more about values and how we can pronounce them.

This brings us to the biggest difference between legal and ethical standards. Ethical standards are based on human rights and injustice, while legal norms are strictly based on what is written in the law. It is very possible that an action is legal, but not ethical. As in the example of solitary parking, both cars adhere to legal standards, but the one that takes the place away from the other driver who was there first does not take into account an ethical standard. «It`s a very difficult topic,» agreed Laura Sack, a New York-based partner and co-chair of the East Coast employment practice at law firm Davis Wright Tremaine. «There`s not a lot of black and white in the world of an HR, but [the questions you face] can still have legal implications.» She plans to join a monastery after fulfilling her obligations and obligations. • Be sufficiently informed of their responsibilities, rights and obligations and ensure that they are properly managed • Be able to transfer responsibility for the appointment of appropriate employees for relevant matters within the company/organization • Compliance with the rules and regulations of the company/organization and maintenance of rules and regulations for employees, etc. • Employees and authorities should always act in accordance with the law of the organization. The main difference between legal and ethical standards lies in the basis of each concept. 2. How did Roosevelt and Taft each negotiate the boundary between law and ethics? Just because the law allows you to do something doesn`t mean it`s the ethical thing to do something. The law establishes what people can do freely, regardless of the impact of these actions on others.

Ethics describes what people should do, taking into account their responsibilities and the foreseeable consequences of their actions. In most cases, it is clear that ethics require more than the law. It is common for people to use these words as if they meant the same thing. Although these terms are closely related, many distinguishing features can be highlighted to determine what is legal and what is ethical. Legal standards are enforced by a government agency, while ethical standards are usually enforced by human principles that involve fair and evil behavior. Thus, legal norms are punished for violations contrary to ethical norms. 2. Does the fact that the Westboro Baptist Church has done everything legally correct make its position acceptable? Do they have to meet ethical limits that go beyond regulatory compliance? Why or why not? 1. What differences do you see between Roosevelt`s and Taft`s views on her ethical responsibility as president? Legal and ethical aspects are imperative for the functioning of an appropriate society. In general, if a person is ethically correct, they are also expected to be legally correct.

If your answer to any of these questions is yes, then consider taking action, Sack said. Of course, this leaves you with a new question: what exactly should this action be? Sack, for her part, would not call the above examples «ethical» issues for HR, but judgment requirements for HR, although she noted that «I can see where they might be considered [ethical dilemmas].» The ethical norm is based primarily on individuals and then on the societal level. No one can impose ethics on anyone, but it comes from introspection. Because ethical dilemmas can be both subjective and nebulous, O`Toole recommends reading A Framework for Ethical Decision Making (Markkula Center for Applied Ethics at Santa Clara University, 2009). It can help you identify ethical issues and think about what steps you should take, he said. Related forms of «legal» include a number of other adjectives such as post-legal, pre-legal, pseudo-legal, quasi-legal and as an adverb – legal. «Legal» as a name is also used in the word «paralegal» and as a designation for individuals who are sanctioned as legitimate or by implementation in a particular set of rules. 5.

What rapprochement with the American presidency, tafts or Roosevelts, do you think it is preferable given legal and ethical considerations? What for? On the other hand, «ethics» is also an adjective as well as a noun and is used in conjunction with the word «ethics». The word comes from the Middle English «etik», which in turn comes from the Latin «eticus» and the earlier Greek «ethikos». It was officially created as a word in 1588. «Ethics» has also derived terms in forms from other parts of the language. The names include «ethics» and «ethics,» while an adverb appears in the word «ethics.» In this discussion, students will reflect critically on the differences and similarities between legal and ethical norms. Use these questions to stimulate in-depth discussion and reflection on these concepts. You do not have to attend this meeting. Because of their common focus on good and evil, the prevention of immoral behavior and the formulation of standards for specialized professions such as doctors and social workers, ethics and law are inextricably linked. Nevertheless, ethics and law are different areas, and a person`s ethical responsibility often outweighs their legal responsibilities. People`s quality of life can be determined by both law and law.