What Is Nature and Scope of Administrative Law

As regards judicial review, the question does not, in principle, arise as to whether a particular decision is `correct` or whether the judge, the minister or the officials have reached a different decision. The questions are: What is the legal limit of the power or the appropriate limit of the discretion that the law has given to the public servant? that the power was exceeded or otherwise unlawfully exercised? Therefore, administrative law does not deal with the merits of the decision, but with the decision-making process. Since administrative law is not a codified right, there is sufficient room for change. According to the change according to the requirements of the state apparatus. As a result, it is more flexible and the rights that govern the procedure do not have to be followed over and over again. Justice is slow, costly, unexpected, complex and formalistic. An overload of the judicial system, which prevented a rapid elimination, also led to strikes and lockouts in disputes between employers and employees. Administrative law is the study of the law that governs the activity of the administrative authorities of the government, which includes: The limits of administrative law extend only when administrative authorities and civil servants exercise legal or public prerogatives or when they exercise public missions. In both civil law and common law countries, these types of functions are sometimes referred to as «public functions» to distinguish them from «private law functions».

The former regulates the relationship between the state and the individual, while the latter regulates the relationship between individual citizens and certain forms of relations with the state, such as relationships based on government contracts. Similarly, I.P. Massey (I.P. Massey, Administrative Law, 5th ed.) identifies the four pillars of the foundation of administrative law as follows: Administrative law aims to provide legal control over administrative power and to protect individuals from abuse of that power. This Act seeks to correct the relationship between public authority and human rights. Landmark cases such as the Puttaswamy privacy case, Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India with regard to the right to travel abroad, Vishakha v. State of Rajasthan with regard to the prevention of sexual harassment of women in the workplace, MC Mehta v. Indian Union on Pollution Control, PUCL v.

UOI on the Rights of Workers in Mines forms the basis for the determination of «criteria». which can be used to clarify the scope of the provisions of the Act and its interpretation. This includes the «right to food». In Ethiopia, legal opinion is far from being considered the least source of administrative law. Only cases below 1% are brought before the courts for judicial review. The issue is unknown to judges, lawyers, lawyers and administrative officials, not to mention the poor and laity, who are supposed to seek redress for illegal administrative acts and abuses of power committed by officials. Since the precedent rule is currently applicable, it is hoped that legal advice can play a limited role as one of the sources of administrative law in Ethiopia. In order to achieve these fundamental objectives, it is necessary to have an administrative system based on the fundamental principles of the rule of law and good administration. A comprehensive, progressive and effective administrative law system is based on the following three principles: Administrative law deals with the powers of administrative authorities, the manner in which these powers are exercised, and the remedies available to aggrieved persons when these powers are abused by those authorities. 1.It deals with the legislative powers of administrative authorities under the common law and various statutes; 2.the judicial and quasi-judicial powers of administrative authorities, i.e. courts, to deal with and remedy problems; In terms of example, delegated legislation refers to any legislation adopted by public authorities other than the legislature, i.e.

central government, state government, central revenue board and other administrative bodies, and is usually expressed in the form of statutory provisions and orders, ordinances, ordinances, programme instructions or communications, etc. Since administrative law contains new rules and regulations according to the requirements of the time, its scope is broad enough to accommodate all these rules and regulations. Generally, it is a law made by a judge, so it varies according to the needs of society. The scope of administrative law is broad since it can function like all three branches of government. It can legislate, enforce the law and make decisions whenever necessary. However, the review of the decision may be carried out and, on the basis of this review, the court may issue guidelines if that decision is contradictory. It may also include certain administrative authorities to regulate a particular area, such as Article 263, which creates the Intergovernmental Council.